Friday, July 27, 2007

How to choose a specialization in B-school?


Cometh, the first term of the first year and the talks that go around amongst enthusiastic first year MBA students in any B-school campus are regarding which specializations to choose. Some B-schools don't necessarily require a specialization, but most of the others do require. And not to forget, specialization is an important jewel to adore your CV.

Given this background, every first year MBA student invariably asks his seniors about which specialization to choose from. And the senior invariably tells him to hang on for a while to get hang of management courses.

All said and done, there are only a few people in any B-school who took specializations which were exactly the same what they thought of before coming to a B-school. And for majority of the others, the streams vary throughout the first year.
But still I felt that I should provide a generalized framework on which specialization gets chosen:

1. Market Forces:
The most important factor behind choosing any specialization is market forces i.e. Demand for graduates from a certain stream.
With this background, finance has long been a favorite of the students for monetary reasons…err.. Finance jobs indeed pay you well! 75% of the first year MBAs want to take up finance and work for an investment bank (Though it’s a different story that some these students portray that it’s not about money but for the love of finance). But hardly anybody knows what an investment bank does?
Also sometimes it happens that students who hardly know a *F* of Finance take up finance just for these dollar dreams. What they tend to forget is that on any given day, hardly 50% of them will be able to draw confidently a cash flow statement from Balance sheet and Profit and Loss statement. Now given the fact that these students will thoroughly struggle (grade-wise and concept-wise) in the two years of academics in a B-school, will they be able to sustain this stupidity and keep on fooling the finance companies (And in turn fooling themselves) for the rest of their lives?

2. Your likings:
* Do those things which your heart tells you to do*, so said the saints, and this statement is aptly true in choosing a specialization. Choose the one which you like the most, the subjects you can enjoy and you are ready to spend not only your 2 years of study but your entire life in that particular field.
In general, people who are creative and/or who fear numbers tend to take up non-quantitive subjects like marketing, HR and people who are conversant with numbers tend to take up courses in Finance, Economics and Operations.
The reason is quite simple, the above-mentioned quantititive courses need precise answers i.e. If the answer to a certain problem in Finance is 110 Rs, then your calculated answer must match with the same whereas marketing and HR is more about finding any answer between 105 Rs and 115 Rs and then relentlessly justifying the same.

So there is always a dilemma between your likings and market forces e.g. I like marketing but finance companies are rocking, what to do? Well, this question is perfectly valid; the simplest test to resolve the dilemma will be to ask yourself a simple question: Imagine, over next 2 years, finance industry goes bust. And forget private yachts, I-Banks start paying shit salaries from which you can buy posters of yachts at max. And if all of a sudden, other fields like HR or systems start paying huge salaries. Will you still take up finance for the love of it?
This test will indeed help you to draw the line between market forces and your likings. And choose the stream accordingly.


3. Profile Building:
In a way, profile building is a part of your likings as specializations are chosen to build a certain profile. In the simplest words, the concept of profile building can be explained as you are going to target a certain profile in the placements and you are trying to build up your path to that profile by taking all relevant courses that matter the most to that profile.
e.g. consulting profile is built up by taking a few good courses in each specialization e.g. SCM (Operations) , Distribution and sales(Marketing) , Business Process Reengineering (IT)

Given this background about profile building, arbitrary specializations like combinations of HR and economics are not chosen together as both of them hardly point to a certain profile. Hence even though your liking can be both HR and economics, profile building/market forces will tend to override the same.

4. Professors:
This is a very minor factor while choosing a specialization. But in case you have dilemma between two specializations, it becomes the critical one.
People choose specialization with more nice professors (Good grades, no attendance issues, good teachers) in case of dilemma!
Even then, professors play a more critical role in choosing a course rather than choosing a specialization.
___________________________________________________________________
All said and done, specializations are more or less chosen by optimization of the top three factors: market forces, your likings and profile building.
Hope t’was exhaustive!

5 comments:

profootball25 said...

Good post :)
Hum jaison ke liye gyaan accha hai :D

Rohit said...

Would beg to differ on most of the points mentioned here. Firstly, the distinction that you make between finance and marketing/HR is not purely on the basis of have-Quant-skills/have-not-Quant-skills as you portray it to be. Second, putting HR and marketing in the same bracket would be wrong because marketing does require quant skills (unless you believe marketing is no different from advertising - marketers would flay you for that)
Third, It is very much possible that mine (or that of many others') heart does not "tell me to do" anything remotely in the realm of management. But I need need money to follow my dreams. And since my job earns me money, I am truly happy about what Im doing.

But on the whole a noble post, have to admit. Just offering a different perspective, I was.

Anonymous said...

Grt inputs Anand...

I'll really thankful that you put the thread on pagalguy for us to go thro..

I would love to see more inputs from you on pagalguy so that most of the junta gets benefitted..

Thanks a lot..
Nishant Dalal
dalalnishant@yahoo.co.in

harsh said...

I guess, you should definitely read this:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_of_multiple_intelligences

It's a theory from Howard Gardner - about humans having multiple intelligences. And, generally from the beginning till the end - our school/undergrad/postgrad curriculum is heavily biased only towards logical/analytical skills as being the only kind of intelligence possible!

Is it justified/logical enough, that you teach the same curriculum to a bunch of differently gifted persons - and expect them to excel at that throughout their lives ?

And, specially so in the B-School bazaar of today's India - where everyone is running after finance as their preferred choice of career, without even realizing their intelligence/core competency/skillsets.

Anonymous said...

well.. wonderful..but i wud agree with rohit on a couple of points.

Nakshatra

Add to Technorati Favorites